- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:33:41 -0500
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EF3A235.70804@openlinksw.com>
On 12/22/11 4:28 PM, Patrick Logan wrote: > > The WebID incubation effort is documented at > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebID and there is a discussion on the mail > list about supporting the Turtle format. We are looking for input from > members of the linked data community generally. > > Currently RDF/XML and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 are required for consumers of > WebID profiles/pages. Support for Turtle would probably be worded as a > required addition to these other formats. > > The incremental cost of supporting Turtle seems fairly low, given > support for RDF/XML. > > Do readers of this list foresee any significant issues with this > addition? Would you recommend this addition? > > Thanks > -Patrick > To get the ball rolling. +1 re., giving Turtle and RDF/XML equal billing. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 21:34:10 UTC