Re: DBpedia: limit of triples

>'yes, i also consider DBpedia buggy in this sense (hence the crossposting)'

Just a small note.
I think you mean that the SPARQL engine behind a particular deployment of
DBpedia is behaving differently from what you would desire. Although there
are bugs in DBpedia, this is not one of them. :) I think it is important to
make this distinction between DBpedia and the SPARQL endpoints serving its
contents exactly to point out that you could provide your own
implementation/wrapper that sorts/limits results the way you want.

With more deployments, everybody benefits from the collaboration and the
competition. On the one hand maybe the traffic will be more evenly spread,
and on the other hand one improvement by a player may push other players to
keep pace.

I would be curious to hear about advantages provided by one endpoint over
another, for example. Has anybody done that?

Cheers
Pablo
On Aug 9, 2011 12:30 PM, "Jörn Hees" <j_hees@cs.uni-kl.de> wrote: