- From: Keith Alexander <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:58:24 +0100
- To: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "David. Huynh" <dfhuynh@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org community" <public-lod@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > I am looking at the process and outcomes I observe, rather than delving into the details. > It is not about whether people could have acted differently - it is about how people actually did act. > A lost opportunity? Clearly there were a number of people who had opinions, and seemed ready to engage in a discussion. I would have been interested to hear what they had to say. But the social dynamics (in my opinion) were such that they no longer chose to contribute. > In answer to your last question: Because the discussion then becomes about the page, rather than principle, or even original topic; but I begin to repeat myself. > Best > Hugh > +1 I had the same impression. The thread started off well, but diverged and became acrimonious and I for one was put off following it because of that. Keith
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 08:58:52 UTC