- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:33:56 -0400
- To: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: "David. Huynh" <dfhuynh@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org community" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 4/14/11 7:10 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote: > Hi Kingsley, > > On 12 Apr 2011, at 22:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> On 4/12/11 4:33 PM, David. Huynh wrote: >>>> I, as well as others I know, find the culture that has developed on this list of responses saying "Well this is how I do it" alienating, and thus sometimes a barrier to posting and genuine responses, and so actually stifles discussion. >> David/Hugh, >> >> I get the point, but don't know the comment target, so I'll respond with regards to myself as one participant in today's extensive debate with Glenn. >> >> I hope I haven't said or inferred "this is how we/I do it" without providing at the very least a link to what I am talking about etc? > I think that is true. > But that is exactly the issue I was raising. > As I said, I don't think this is usually the best way to respond to a post. Hugh, I am a little confused. The problem is providing a link to accentuate a point or not doing so? Put differently you are talking about more text and fewer links or more links and fewer text? Kingsley > Best > Hugh >> More than anything else, I believe tractable discussion and debate is good. That's the most predictable route (I know) to solving real problems etc.. >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Kingsley Idehen >> President& CEO >> OpenLink Software >> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen >> >> >> >> >> -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 11:34:21 UTC