Re: Discussion meta-comment

On 4/14/11 7:10 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
> Hi Kingsley,
>
> On 12 Apr 2011, at 22:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>
>> On 4/12/11 4:33 PM, David. Huynh wrote:
>>>>   I, as well as others I know, find the culture that has developed on this list of responses saying "Well this is how I do it" alienating, and thus sometimes a barrier to posting and genuine responses, and so actually stifles discussion.
>> David/Hugh,
>>
>> I get the point, but don't know the comment target, so I'll respond with regards to myself as one participant in today's extensive debate with Glenn.
>>
>> I hope I haven't said or inferred "this is how we/I do it" without providing at the very least a link to what I am talking about etc?
> I think that is true.
> But that is exactly the issue I was raising.
> As I said, I don't think this is usually the best way to respond to a post.

Hugh,

I am a little confused.

The problem is providing a link to accentuate a point or not doing so?  
Put differently you are talking about more text and fewer links or more 
links and fewer text?


Kingsley
> Best
> Hugh
>> More than anything else, I believe tractable discussion and debate is good. That's the most predictable route (I know)  to solving real problems etc..
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen	
>> President&   CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen

Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 11:34:21 UTC