- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:57:37 -0400
- To: glenn mcdonald <glenn@furia.com>
- CC: Rob Vesse <rav08r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4DA46861.4070307@openlinksw.com>
On 4/12/11 10:50 AM, glenn mcdonald wrote: > >> BIND(URI(CONCAT("http://dbpedia.org/resource/", ?label)) AS >> ?dbpResource) >> >> The 1.0/1.1 clunkiness is just temporary, but I feel obliged to >> point out the hand-waving in this join-via-URI-concatenation... > What now? You don't like the manner in which a solution has been > constructed? What are you looking for here? > > > I really think you can figure out for yourself what's not so great > about this "solution". But to go ahead and state the obvious, this is > concatenating wordnet's rdfs:label for these planets directly into a > dbpedia URI. This will only work if the identifiers happen to line up > exactly. Which they do in the case of these 8 (!) entities, but I > wouldn't want to rely on that tactic in general. Again, is it about quibbling about tactics or solving the problem. Stop quibbling, contribute a solution. That's my fundamental point. Each time someone attempts to make a contribution you quibble without ever providing an alternative. It' really really easy to quibble. Much harder to do and be judged. How about a solution from you? Then sit back and enjoy the effects of others quibbling about your solution without any sense of what its taken you to produce said solution etc.. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 14:58:06 UTC