- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:43:51 +0200
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org, pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
Hi Bernard, (cc-ed ) On 4/1/2011 5:07 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote: > But at http://dbpedia.org/ontology/ itself I get > > @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . > @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . > <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/> rdf:type owl:Ontology ; > owl:versionInfo "Version 3.5"@en . > > Missing a triple such as > > <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/> rdfs:isDefinedBy foo > > I've got at least a version number :) > > So where is the RDF file containing the whole ontology? [1] references [2], which is a zipped file of the DBPedia Ontology. However, you are absolutely right, re. Linked Data publishing principles it might beneficial if, e.g., curl -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml" http://dbpedia.org/ontology/ or curl -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml" http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person would resolve to a RDF/XML serialized description. It is a basic requirement especially re. Semantic Web ontology deployment to serve semantic graphs in different serializations formats. You are also right re. the application of rdfs:isDefinedBy for universals that are part of this ontology. Cheers, Bob [1] http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Ontology [2] http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.6/dbpedia_3.6.owl.bz2
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 15:44:24 UTC