- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:25:57 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org
Dear all:
Are there any theoretical or practical problems caused by defining the
range of an owl:DatatypeProperty as
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anySimpleType
or
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal
?
I think both should be valid (and are useful) in OWL DL ontologies,
but several tools seem to complain:
1. http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator - creates warnings
"Undefined Datatype: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anySimpleType"
2. Protégé 3.4 throws an error message on rdfs:Literal
"SEVERE: Cannot convert range DefaultRDFSNamedClass (http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal
) of DefaultOWLDatatypeProperty (foo:textprop)"
Best
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
* Quickstart Guide for Developers: http://bit.ly/quickstart4gr
* Vocabulary Reference: http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1
* Developer's Wiki: http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations
* Examples: http://bit.ly/cookbook4gr
* Presentations: http://bit.ly/grtalks
* Videos: http://bit.ly/grvideos
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 12:26:29 UTC