- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:00:54 -0400
- To: mnot@mnot.net, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Mark, I just read your note [1] re. @rev. Is it judicious to drop @rev just on the basis of potential confusion? In reality, we used @rev in DBpedia to completely demystify what's happening re. Linked Data i.e., the critical relation between a Descriptor Documents and its Unambiguously Named (via Generic HTTP URI) Subject. In one single URL-rewrite move we've been able to solve a complex and typically jargon ladened riddle. If you veer people away from @rev, we are taking steps backward. Links: 1. http://xml.coverpages.org/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-10.txt -- Web Linking Note 2. http://mediterraneanceramics.blogspot.com/2010/05/document-and-concept-this-and-how.html -- a post about Descriptor Documents and their Unambiguously Named Subjects . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:01:23 UTC