- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:06:31 -0400
- To: "KangHao Lu (Kenny)" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- CC: ML public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, Tom Heath <tom.heath@talis.com>
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote: > [SNIP] > The point is we don't want machine generated URIs (sorry I can't see > what's inside <http://community.linkeddata.org/ods> cause it's down > for the moment). We should have triples like Please note, I was trying to tell you that there once lived a Linked Data Space that was put in place for dog-fooding. It came to be in 2008 prior to WWW2008 in Beijing. As I said, Tom Heath nuked it, you should be able to find the thread about this via mailing list archives. Please digest what I am saying. > > <http://linkeddata.org/data#swig> foaf:member > <http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i>. > <http://linkeddata.org/data#swig> foaf:member > <http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card#me> . > <http://linkeddata.org/data#swig> foaf:member > <http://dig.csail.mit.edu/People/kennyluck#I> . > <http://linkeddata.org/data#swig> > foaf:member<http://kidehen.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this> . Yes, I do understand all of that :-) And even more, I await the RDF data at this URL: <http://linkeddata.org/data> <http://linkeddata.org/data#swig> > > that is, URIs of different domains in the proposed file already, > without asking these people to make the updates (this makes things > easier, you know, for example, timbl would be too busy to even make > such a little update). The rest depends on what's inside the FOAFs > (bblfish, you ought to make DOAP for your projects and add links from > yourself to those projects!!) We can use machine generated URIs, but > we need to manually maintain those owl:sameAs mappings anyway. > >> All you have to do is walk through the LOD mail archives to see how >> it came to an end. Tom Heath didn't want it there, and as far as I >> was concerned, I simply wasn't interested in grappling with him; its >> his domain (bottom line) and he has the right to do whatever with it >> (my last comments in an old mail thread about this matter). > I suppose you meant > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2008Apr/0116.html ? > Could you give me another pointer if I am wrong? That was about history, the Linked Data Space has long gone. Of course, I can make another one, but I am not going to use linkeddata.org, after my last experience. > > I guess Tom was simply unwilling to set up a system as huge as ODS. My > proposal only requires a little space for plain-text N3. Anyway, I > want to ask "what SWIG people are doing?" as fast as possible, so I > prefer a simple approach. Why speak for Tom? Why jump to conclusions about ODS? This has little to do with ODS (since http://community.linkeddata.org was just a DNS entry mapped to a space I set up). Can't get an N3 representation of my profile at: <http://kingsley.idehen.name/dataspace/person/kidehen> or <http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen> ? Both of which are produced by ODS post account creation with FOAF+SSL to boot, all in 5 minutes or less. > > I could place this file in the domain of my organization, or we can > ask W3C people to make such a little file. The choice of > linkeddata.org is because it somehow represents our community, since > it's the first hit. > >> Dog-fooding is what I sought, but I can only assume, my objectives >> where totally unclear. >> >> There is a strange irony that continues to play out with this thing >> called the World Wide Web, it doesn't have an eraser, but we continue >> to act as though it does or we can't be bothered to lookup the past >> (even via Google) etc.. > It was a real pain to find the above link. Well, text search is like > that, very silly. I would be very happy if I have to chance to SIOCize > W3C mailing lists and make a SPARQL endpoint for that. Again, dog-fooding, of course you shouldn't need Google, but until you feel the pain, asking you to perform a Precision Search and Find would sound like nothing more than a product sales pitch :-) > > Also, when something is brought up again and again, that usually means > the importance of such thing. Tell me about it :-) > > Kenny > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Friday, 26 March 2010 17:07:00 UTC