- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:23:12 +0000
- To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi All, I've been putting some thought in to RDF Serializations in the context of linked data; and ever increasingly I'm questioning why I feel the need to offer "the same" RDF graphs serialized in different formats. I guess a specific questions would be, does anybody operate a linked data consuming library that doesn't support a particular serialization? I'm starting to see this more as a processing / computation load transfer between server and client, where most clients could easily convert the serialization from one format to another, but prefer to offload this to the server where possible. What I'm gunning for in the end, is to only expose all linked data / rdf as static RDF+XML documents within my application - would this in any way make the data "less" linked because some clients don't support RDF+XML or could I take it for granted that everybody (for instance everybody on this list) could handle this serialization. Any other comments or thoughts people may have on this topic are more than welcome. Many Regards, Nathan
Received on Friday, 12 March 2010 10:23:49 UTC