- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:58:46 +0000
- To: Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>
- Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 12:03 -0500, Paul Houle wrote:
> <meta rel="{predicate}" content="{object}" />
> <meta rel="{predicate}" content="{object}" datatype="{type_of_object}" />
You want to use @property, not @rel. Also, don't forget @xml:lang!
> Am I missing anything?
To bullet-proof it, you may want to explicitly set @about on *all* the
<link> and <meta> elements, plus @xml:lang on all <meta> elements, to
avoid chaining, and avoid inheriting language tags from <head> or
<html>.
> Requirement: Ability to embed RDFa in a document that is not,
> globally, a valid XHTML document
Why not just use the HTML+RDFa draft being worked on by the HTML WG in
conjunction with the RDFa WG? It specifies how RDFa can be used in
so-called "tag soup" HTML.
I know of at least three tools that implement HTML+RDFa at least
experimentally:
* RDF::RDFa::Parser - my own Perl RDFa parser.
* PyRDFa - the code that powers the W3C's "RDFa distiller" service.
* Damien Steer's Java RDFa parser which I can't remember the name of.
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 09:59:26 UTC