- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:01:23 +0100
- To: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
- CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Christoph, Are you aware of the respective HTTPbis ticket [1]? Cheers, Michael [1] http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/43 -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de> > Organization: Jacobs University Bremen > Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:40:42 +0200 > To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org> > Subject: 303 redirect to a fragment what should a linked data client do? > Resent-From: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:40:31 +0000 > > Hi all, > > in our setup we are still somehow fighting with ill-conceived legacy URIs > from the pre-LOD age. We heavily make use of hash URIs there, so it could > happen that a client, requesting http://example.org/foo#bar (thus actually > requesting http://example.org/foo) gets redirected to > http://example.org/baz#grr (note that I don't mean > http://example.org/baz%23grr here, but really the un-escaped hash). I > observed that when serving such a result as XHTML, the browser (at least > Firefox) scrolls to the #grr fragment of the resulting page. > > But what should an RDF-aware client do? I guess it should still look out for > triples with the originally requested subject http://example.org/foo#bar, e.g. > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/foo#bar">, or (assuming > xml:base="http://example.org/foo") for <rdf:Description rdf:ID="bar">. Is my > assumption right? > > Thanks in advance for any help, > > Christoph > > -- > Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 12:02:01 UTC