- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:01:32 +0100
- To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi All, I'm just wondering what approaches people are taking to describing non rdf/html resources, such as Images, PDFs and similar? Given that we have a jpeg with the URL http://example.org/image.jpg would we: give it the Identifier <http://example.org/image.jpg#this> and serve an RDF description via conneg give it the Identifer <http://example.org/image#this> and again serve an RDF description via conneg - a possible issue introduced here is if you have an alternative SVG version with it's own fragments(?) (SVGTINY12[1]) give it a completely different Identifier <http://example.org/r/132#image> and 'link' from the descriptor to the image with..? (dcterms:hasFormat, sioc:link, uri:uri, link:uri, other?) and on the reverse, how about descriptor discovery for images/PDFs etc, expose via the Link header (tight coupling to HTTP), or? As a side but related question, do we see the Web Of Data as running autonomous to the Web of Documents, as in it is taken that rdf / linked data clients will purely run over the web of linked data and reference non rdf resources via links with no backwards discovery needed, or is the link from web of documents back to web of data needed by any specific use cases? does conneg suffice? what if the image is <ftp://example.org/image.jpg>? Best, Nathan [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SVGTiny12-20081222
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 13:02:30 UTC