Re: Organization ontology from Mike Norton on 2010-06-07 (public-lod@w3.org from June 2010)

From: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Emmanouil Batsis \(Manos\)" <manos@abiss.gr>, William Waites <ww-keyword-okfn.193365@styx.org>
Cc: William Waites <william.waites@okfn.org>, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, public-egov-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <682518.82481.qm@web82405.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

I can see Manos' point.   It seems that LegalEntity rather the Organization would work well under a sub-domain such as .LAW or .DOJ or .SEC, but under other sub-domains such as .NASA, the Organization element might be better served as ProjectName.   All instances would help specify the Organization type, while keeping Organization as the general unstylized element is probably ideal, as inferred by William Waites.
 
Michael A. Norton
 




________________________________
>>From: Emmanouil Batsis (Manos) manos@abiss.gr
>>
>>a) the way i get FormalOrganization, it could as well be called LegalEntity to be more precise.

Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 22:18:31 UTC