- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:25:57 -0400
- To: Søren Roug <soren.roug@eea.europa.eu>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Søren Roug wrote: > Hi lod-public, > > Peter de Vries alerted me to the presence of this mailing list, and since > you're currently discussing species modeling, I thought I would add my 2 > cents. > Welcome! > I'm the maintainer of a site called EUNIS, which is used by the European > Commission to determine whether species, habitat types or sites need a change > in legislation and protection. There are about 200.000 species in the > database. We have over the last couple of months given it an overhaul and > added some linked data functionality. It is still a work in progress, and > we'll continue the improvements. The way we have implemented Linked Data is to > look at the accept header, and then either send text/html or > application/rdf+xml without a redirection. This means that for e.g. > http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/1038 the HTML and the RDF output is the > same URL. > What you are saying is: I have a descriptor document that's available in HTML (default) and RDF/XML formats, with either format delivered to user agents via content negotiation. But, I don't see an Identifier for the main Subject of your Descriptor docs. For instance, in the HTML descriptor doc all I see currently is a literal value: Falco peregrinus. When looking at the RDF descriptor doc variant I see: <http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/1038> . For very little cost (re. tweaking your RDF data) you could just add "#this" to <http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/1038> making it: <http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/1038#this>, within your RDF and HTML descriptor docs. To conclude: you need to unambiguously Name your Descriptor Document and Descriptor Document Subject using distinct Generic HTTP URIs. Kingsley > A note about our semantics. We're not using the predicate > skos:closeMatch like Pete. We have created two predicates. > 1. sameSynonym, which links a binomial name and author to the same > binomial name and author in the foreign database. (taking into account > different spellings and abbreviations). The purpose is to validate that our > name is used by at least one other database. > 2. sameSpecies, which links from a EUNIS accepted name to an accepted > name in the foreign database. The side-effect is that the species name might > change when you follow the link. sameSpecies is a sub-property of owl:sameAs. > > We also have negative matches: notSameSynonym and notSameSpecies. These are > used when there is a high likelyhood of assuming it is the same species, and a > maintainer has determined it is not. > > Practical examples: > > Danaus plexippus (Monarch butterfly) http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/90910 > Canis lupus (Gray wolf) http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/90910 > The Polish site Lasy Janowskie http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/90910 > > Best regards, > > Søren Roug > European Environment Agency > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Saturday, 5 June 2010 13:26:57 UTC