- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:59:22 +0200
- To: Nicholas Humfrey <nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Nicholas Humfrey <nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > Hello, > > I have added external links to dbpedialite, for example see Berlin: > http://dbpedialite.org/things/3354 > > Is there a better predicate to use than rdfs:seeAlso? I am not sure if it is > correct because the link is just a random webpage, rather than an > rdfs:Resource but not found anything better. Perhaps an openvocab subclass > of rdfa:seeAlso? If you're pointing at documents, you could use foaf:page (inverse of foaf:topic) to say that those pages have (the city) Berlin as a topic. Or if you're more confident, foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf (inverse of foaf:primaryTopic). Oh hey, in the 1/2 hour since I started drafted this reply, I see the conversation has gone in this direction. Yeah it sounds like foaf:topic or foaf:page fit. I don't particularly enjoy RDF vocabs having inverses in them but for that matter we do have both directions named in FOAF, so pick whatever suits your markup best. I lean towards 'topic' as the most intuitively named, but DBpedia uses 'page', which might be worth bearing in mind... Dan
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 16:59:55 UTC