- From: Bernhard Schandl <bernhard.schandl@univie.ac.at>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:29:11 +0200
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>
- Cc: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi, > I agree with Pat in that case, that it would just be easier not to put restrictions > in the abstract rdf syntax at all, instead of complicating things all over the place. > There are pragmatic reasons why sentences such as > > <http://bblfish.net/#hjs> "name" "Henry" . > > are not going to be successful, the main one being that it is impossible to > adjudicate what the relation "name" refers to is about. In that respect, "name" is not different than any URI one has never seen before. What about adding "name" rdfs:subPropertyOf foaf:name . to this example? Best Bernhard
Received on Friday, 9 July 2010 07:29:51 UTC