- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:29:23 +0000
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Tim Finin <finin@cs.umbc.edu>
- CC: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>, Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 02/07/2010 05:36, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > In OWL-DL it is so restricted. Emphasis on the DL. So, don't use > owl:sameAs. Use your own propietary sameAs; it needn't even be > symmetric. We are after all taking RDF here, not OWL-DL. And in the > case under discussion (keeping Jeremy from losing thousands of dollars > or much restful sleep), nobody outside the company is ever going to > see the strange sameAs triples which protect his archaic but expensive > code from the wild syntactic deviance in the new RDF. Sure - just as we don't actually use owl:sameAs triples for internal storage in http://sameas.org/ We just provide them as an output format. Hugh > > Pat
Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 10:30:59 UTC