Re: Subjects as Literals

Pat,

On 7/1/2010 11:14 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
>

<snip>
> That is fine. Nobody mandates that your (or anyone else's) software 
> must be able to handle all cases of RDF. But to impose an irrational 
> limitation on a standard just because someone has spent a lot of money 
> is a very bad way to make progress, IMO. Although, I believe that 
> there are still people using COBOL, so you may have a point.
>

It was reported that the average American has nearly 4,000 interactions 
with COBOL based transaction systems per year. 
http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh060109-story03.html

So, yes, there are people still using COBOL.

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)

Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau

Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 09:34:06 UTC