- From: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:02:31 +0100
- To: "Pierre-Antoine" <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Cc: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <201001271202.38573.ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
Dear all, thanks for your helpful replies. I will summarize with a few comments. Of course the conceptual difference between a non-information resource and an information resource is clear to me; I was rather concerned about how relevant this is in an implementation where this difference is not needed. (OK, I see, one might initially be tempted to think "we don't need this" but then later realize that "we should have sticked to good practices", so better introduce it from the beginning…) Given the FOAF example by Ross, I then wondered: If id/me 303-redirects to id/me.rdf, then id/me.rdf contains triples like <id/me> foaf:name "Ian Davis". Now if Ian Davis (not any external user) wanted to attach metadata to id/me.rdf, e.g. <id/me.rdf> todo:needs "rework" where would _he_ do it? Is it advisable to put them into the id/me.rdf file as well, or should he rather put them somewhere else? In any case, the Halpin/Presutti paper mentioned by Pierre-Antoine, of which I am somewhat aware, seems to give a reasonable answer. @Pierre-Antoine, your 200 OK / Content-Location solution appeals to me, as it is actually what I initially asked for. But given its non-support by browsers it makes sense to me that it should not be used. I may eventually get back to you with more specific (and more philosophical!) questions, as the domain I am actually mostly dealing with is the management of mathematical knowledge. E.g. me taking Fermat's last theorem (having dc:creator "Fermat") and formalizing it in an appropriate language (e.g. OMDoc), linking it to a proof and to examples formalized by me (or others) in the same formal language, finally all having dc:creator <...#me>. There, the formalizations (= information resources) tend to be more important than the non-information resources they originate from. One would rather not describe the non-information resource in the same language, but put a link to e.g. DBpedia. Cheers, and thanks again, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 11:02:43 UTC