- From: Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:47:54 +0000
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Jeni, 2010/1/18 Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>: > Do you think that http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/ is sufficient for > describing the relationships between graphs (for these purposes) and if not, > what do you think needs adding? No I don't think its sufficient, certainly not for the kinds of use cases that Paul was describing. The RDFG schema only has two properties defining equivalency and a sub-set relationship. I was thinking more along the lines of a means to describe the process of constructing a graph by operations on a set of other graphs, where those operations would include basic algrebra operators. Cheers, L. -- Leigh Dodds Programme Manager, Talis Platform Talis leigh.dodds@talis.com http://www.talis.com
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 20:48:24 UTC