- From: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:04:23 +0100
- To: martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
- Cc: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>, Ross Singer <rossfsinger@gmail.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>, Freebase Experts <freebase-experts@freebase.com>, public-lod@w3.org, Michael F F Uschold <uschold@gmail.com>
This issue had several threads on mailing lists. See e.g. my recap of a thread in SWIG from May 2008 [1]. Not a lot of evolution from that time, except it seems now pretty clear that we need a vocabulary to talk about different similarity relations (the most recent request for it came from Pat Hayes at Washington Vocamp). However, a new vocabulary for similarity relations would also carry the need to "educate" people in using it, and would hamper interoperability with existing owl:sameAs datasets. However, better soon than never, I think :). Ciao Aldo [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008May/0126.html On 7 Jan 2010, at 22:39, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote: > hi ross, > apologies for the delay! > > as long as both URIs represent a book title, i have no objections. > > my comment was a rather generic warning - URNs and "non-URN URIs" > can of course be linked by owl:sameAs. > > intelligence of a human or machine agent depends on the subtleness > and quality of that agent's category system. if everything is sameAs > to lots of other things, then the amount of intelligent conclusions > you can draw from the LOD cloud will be limited. > > best > martin > > > > Ross Singer wrote: >> Martin, >> >> Given that there's apparently considerable disagreement here (and >> probably plenty of confusion), can you elaborate on what exactly you >> object to in this request? >> >> The first objection I saw raised was by Tom Morris ("is a FreeBase >> topic really a book?") and agree that urn:isbn:9780670063260 is not >> the same thing as http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/en.on_the_road. >> >> However, I'm not sure I see that distinction between >> urn:isbn:9780670063260 and >> http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/soft.isbn.9780670063260.best as they're >> both trying to identify an edition (or, loosely, a >> frbr:Manifestation) >> of a work. >> >> My questions would be: >> 1) If the latter relationship is not a good fit for owl:sameAs, why? >> 2) if #1 is true, what is a better alternative? >> >> I understand the rationale of not wanting to water down the semantics >> of owl:sameAs to the point that it's little more than rdfs:seeAlso >> with louder voice. At the same time, it's difficult to see if your >> issue is with a type mismatch between a URN and a URI; how FreeBase >> models their data; or general "mutually assured destruction"-ness of >> owl:sameAs. >> >> Thanks, >> -Ross. >> >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Martin Hepp (UniBW) >> <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: >> >>> dear all: >>> quite clearly, a book title is not the same as a book, and if the >>> linked >>> data community continues to link apples and oranges via owl:sameAs >>> then >>> either >>> >>> - the socially agreed meaning owl:sameAs is being degraded to >>> untyped href >>> in HTML >>> or >>> - vast amount of data in the linked data cloud turns useless >>> >>> but as a minimum precaution against spoiling the graph of data, >>> put your >>> sameAs statements into separate graphs so that meaningful >>> applications can >>> filter them out easily. >>> >>> best >>> >>> martin >>> >>> Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> >>>> Daniel O'Connor wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com >>>>> <mailto:tfmorris@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> But is the description of the book (ie Freebase topic) really >>>>> the same >>>>> thing as the book? >>>>> >>>>> Assuming it was, wouldn't you not only have to make the sameAs >>>>> assertions and publish them someplace, but also get them >>>>> loaded into >>>>> sameas.org <http://sameas.org>? >>>>> >>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Shawn Simister >>>>> <narphorium@gmail.com <mailto:narphorium@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> > Are you just looking for a script that can make the 'same as' >>>>> assertions >>>>> > like this? >>>>> > >>>>> > http://rdfbooks.freebaseapps.com/ns/soft.isbn.9780670063260.best >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ah hah! >>>>> >>>>> Now how to (nicely) get that indexed... >>>>> >>>> Make a linkset and publish it via: >>>> >>>> 1. A data dump >>>> 2. SPARQL endpoint >>>> 3. Your Linked Data Space . >>>> >>>> Then you have your index, and others can make their variants by >>>> meshing >>>> their data with yours :-) >>>> >>>> Re. DBpedia, we can add the linkset to its own Named Graph as >>>> we've done >>>> with other linksets. >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> martin hepp >>> e-business & web science research group >>> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen >>> >>> e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org >>> phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 >>> fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 >>> www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) >>> http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) >>> skype: mfhepp twitter: mfhepp >>> >>> Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! >>> ================================================================= >>> >>> Project page: >>> http://purl.org/goodrelations/ >>> >>> Resources for developers: >>> http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations >>> >>> Webcasts: >>> Overview - http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ >>> How-to - http://vimeo.com/7583816 >>> >>> Recipe for Yahoo SearchMonkey: >>> http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_and_Yahoo_SearchMonkey >>> >>> Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: "Semantic Web-based >>> E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology" >>> http://www.slideshare.net/mhepp/semantic-webbased-ecommerce-the-goodrelations-ontology-1535287 >>> >>> Overview article on Semantic Universe: >>> http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html >>> >>> Tutorial materials: >>> ISWC 2009 Tutorial: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in Brief: A >>> Hands-on >>> Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! >>> SearchMonkey >>> http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/Web_of_Data_for_E-Commerce_Tutorial_ISWC2009 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------- > martin hepp > e-business & web science research group > universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen > > e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org > phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 > fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 > www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) > http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) > skype: mfhepp twitter: mfhepp > > Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! > ================================================================= > > Project page: > http://purl.org/goodrelations/ > > Resources for developers: > http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations > > Webcasts: > Overview - http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ > How-to - http://vimeo.com/7583816 > > Recipe for Yahoo SearchMonkey: > http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_and_Yahoo_SearchMonkey > > Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: "Semantic Web-based > E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology" > http://www.slideshare.net/mhepp/semantic-webbased-ecommerce-the-goodrelations-ontology-1535287 > > Overview article on Semantic Universe: > http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html > > Tutorial materials: > ISWC 2009 Tutorial: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in Brief: A Hands- > on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! > SearchMonkey http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/Web_of_Data_for_E-Commerce_Tutorial_ISWC2009 > > > _____________________________________ Aldo Gangemi Senior Researcher Semantic Technology Lab (STLab) Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology, National Research Council (ISTC-CNR) Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma, Italy Tel: +390644161535 Fax: +390644161513 aldo.gangemi@cnr.it http://www.stlab.istc.cnr.it http://www.istc.cnr.it/createhtml.php?nbr=71 skype aldogangemi
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 16:05:00 UTC