Re: Linked Open Data star badges

1. Let's try to avoid cross-posting if not necessary. This discussion is
already ongoing in CKAN discuss [1].

2. Antoine, you and others (incl. dataset publishers) are free to use it -
or ignore it. If you want to see it happen at [2], then I'd suggest you just
go there and implement it.

3. The badges, just as TimBL's original star scheme, are a marketing
vehicle. Something, CTOs, Web developers, content owners such as government
agencies, etc. should be able to comprehend rather easily. Let's not try to
make a science out of it.

/me back to some work with concrete output and potential impact ;)

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-discuss/2010-December/000819.html
[2] http://esw.w3.org/DataSetRDFDumps

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Pablo Mendes <pablomendes@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:20:00 +0100
> To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>,
> <ckan-discuss@lists.okfn.org>
> Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Linked Data community
> <public-lod@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Linked Open Data star badges
> 
> Maybe there is a potential of interaction between CKAN Curation Tool and the
> LOD badges?
> 
> "a tool that looks at
> <http://packages.python.org/curate/overview.html> packages
> on CKAN, applies some rules, and produces some output.
> The<http://packages.python.org/curate/overview.html>
> output might be instructions to add a tag to a package or it might be
> to add a package to a group."<http://packages.python.org/curate/overview.html>
> http://packages.python.org/curate/overview.html
> 
> "The LOD badges are based on
> TimBL's 5-star data scheme"
> http://lab.linkeddata.deri.ie/2010/lod-badges/
> 
> Cheers,
> Pablo
> 
> <http://packages.python.org/curate/overview.html>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Antoine Zimmermann <
> antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Michael,
>> 
>> 
>> Good job, I like the look of these badges.
>> However, I'm wondering: will the people who have a 0 or 1-star dataset put
>> a badge on their Web page? It's like putting a badge saying "HTML page
>> /almost/ valid: 3 errors only!"
>> In the end, I guess only the 5 star badge will be proudly displayed by
>> dataset owners.
>> Still, I think those badges have a utility, but not for the dataset owners.
>> I can imagine a web page listing existing, independent datasets (such as
>> [1]) where each row has the corresponding badge. This way, one can
>> immediately and visually determine the level of interoperability of the
>> dataset.
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://esw.w3.org/DataSetRDFDumps
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> AZ.
>> 
>> Le 07/12/2010 11:09, Michael Hausenblas a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>>> If you want to express your support for LOD data on your dataset Web page,
>>> you can now use the LOD badges [1] to do so. The LOD badges are based on
>>> TimBL's 5-star data scheme, which has been made available via [2].
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>>       Michael
>>> 
>>> [1] http://lab.linkeddata.deri.ie/2010/lod-badges/
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Antoine Zimmermann
>> Researcher at:
>> Laboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information
>> Database Group
>> 7 Avenue Jean Capelle
>> 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex
>> France
>> Lecturer at:
>> Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
>> 20 Avenue Albert Einstein
>> 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex
>> France
>> antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr
>> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
>> 
>>

Received on Saturday, 11 December 2010 09:35:25 UTC