- From: John Flynn <jflynn@bbn.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:45:50 -0500
- To: <public-lod@w3.org>, "'Semantic Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: "'John Flynn'" <jflynn@bbn.com>
It is possible that many domain ontologies will emerge as quasi-standards over time. This process would be similar to what has happened in other communities. For example, in the human resources domain the HR-XML Consortium (1) has been developing and refining HR-related XML schema (2) for many years. Some other large company/organization might feel the necessity and be willing to invest the resources into developing their own different HR XML schema, but many companies would feel confident in using the HR-XML "standard" that has been developed by the HR-XML Consortium. In the Semantic Web world if, for example, the Association of International Automobile Manufactures decided to invest in developing an OWL ontology for the automotive domain, it would make sense for many to reuse that domain ontology rather than developing one of their own or using one developed by some less verifiable source. Some such "standards" are already emerging, but it will take time for ontologies across many domains to emerge and they will be developed only when the communities of interest feel it is in their financial interest to do so. In the meanwhile the development and vetting by the community of small ontologies that describe common concepts would provide templates that others could confidently reuse. It would be useful if some respected organization might establish formal vetting procedures and collect these vetted ontologies and place them on a web site for all to reuse. (1) http://www.hr-xml.org/hr-xml/wms/hr-xml-1-org/index.php?language=2 (2) http://www.hr-xml.org/hr-xml/wms/hr-xml-1-org/index.php?id={E00DA03B685A0DD1 8FB6A08AF0923DE0|139|2}
Received on Sunday, 5 December 2010 15:48:04 UTC