- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:50:08 +0000
- To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
- CC: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Sorry to be slow - been away, and am lazy :-) That sounds great - stable LD URIs for these things are important. I find I did a version of all this as LD (with SPARQL, voiD, etc) when the Billion triples challenge came out last year, at http://wordnet.rkbexplorer.com/ . I'm would guess it's out of date, and probably rougher than yours, but it might be useful if you sent me the sameas pairs and I will stuff them in sameas.org, in case anyone has used our URIs in the meantime. Linking is good. Best Hugh On 17/06/2010 13:29, "Jacco van Ossenbruggen" <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl> wrote: > Dear all, > > We have published a beta version of the RDF version of Princeton's > Wordnet 3.0 at > > http://semanticweb.cs.vu.nl/lod/wn30/ > > We hope that this can version can quickly develop into a stable resource > for the LOD community, and therefore request your comments and > feedback. If you have any concrete tips for improvements or additions, > please let us know. > > This new conversion has been made by Mark van Assem and colleagues, > using an updated version of the same software that was used to create > the 2.0 version hosted by W3C [1]. We again aim at a complete > conversion of the original data published by Princeton (a.k.a the "full" > version), and have retained the option to choose the more light weight > "basic" version (see [1]) for details). > > We would like to have the RDF schema and uri scheme stable as soon as > possible, so if you have suggestions in this area, please let us know > a.s.a.p. The mappings to Wordnet 2.0 and other related resources are > still work in progress, as is a SKOS-compliant version. > > Cheers, > > Jacco > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wordnet-rdf/ >
Received on Monday, 23 August 2010 01:51:15 UTC