- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:38:33 -0400
- To: Mischa Tuffield <mmt04r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Mischa Tuffield <mmt04r@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > There are some best practises to writing and and publishing RDF vocabs. You can find them on the W3C site : > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2006-01-18/ The final version of that doc might have a bit more polish [1]. I'm kind of a fan of using RDFa to publish vocabularies, since it is incredibly lightweight (you can just publish a static HTML document). For example, we felt like we needed to create a few pieces of vocabulary for the National Digital Newspaper Program, so we simply published an HTML document as part of the web application [2]. If you need something to manage the namespace I'd take a look at Neologism [3]. The openvocab [4] solution is also requires very little on your part. //Ed [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/ [2] http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/terms/ [3] http://neologism.deri.ie/ [4] http://open.vocab.org/
Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 13:39:02 UTC