- From: Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:15:05 -0300
- To: Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <h2y3e12f6f41004091315naa5c7296u27c2f699f536b4d1@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>wrote: > > Let's be creative about stuff we'd build with the web of data. Assume the > Linked Data Web would be there already, what would build? > > Lots of things: (1) A 'smart' encyclopedia that can reformat Wikipedia (and other content) for specific audiences/context. For instance, a children's encyclopedia, an encyclopedia about what people in Heian Japan could have plausibility known about, etc. (2) Systems that add 'Xanalogical' (sorry T. Nelson) structure to text based on text understanding. For instance, if I'm reading a text, I want something that can infer intertextuality and add 'footnotes' that clarify any issue that I want clarified. The text involved could be anything: tweets, "cheat sheets" for video games (how exactly can I get that item?), scientific papers, Shakespeare, even parallel texts. (I'd love to line up an English translation of the Kojiiki w/ the archaic original Japanese and have tools that let somebody who barely understands Japanese [me] get a lot out of it) (3) A site like boxedup.com without all the stupid web 2.0 features that never really worked... I want to be able to just bookmark an item and have the system extract good data about it... and NOT ask me to fill out tags. The book "Pull" makes a good case for how semantic technology enables ambient computing... I had a talk with an a MIT media lab graduate years ago who was fundamentally skeptical about the ability of computers to understand context and do the kind of things that a good butler does. Ultimately a big 'commonsense' knowledge base is going to make 'impossible' things happen. http://thepowerofpull.com/pull/
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 20:15:38 UTC