- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:49:56 -0400
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- CC: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, nathan@webr3.org, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Niklas Lindström wrote: > Hi Michael, > > that's great! If [2] were to be updated with that [1] (i.e. officially > containing RDFa about these URI:s), and would be 303:d to from [3] > (along with anything under that URL), this would be all we need. I > know it hasn't happened for years, but sometimes a nudge at just the > right time may be all it takes.. > > If not, would you consider updating your interim solution to describe > URI:s under [1]? I mean, since [2] currently uses the real IANA URI:s > (i.e. the "unsanctioned" ones) and those, as Danny cautioned, could > end up e.g. being resolved to documents, breaking semantics (as well > as not being discoverable). > > I did a manual (well, vim-macro:ed) conversion of [3] into RDF/XML, > but had to leave to eat easter eggs at my sister's and entertain her > kids. :) It's located at [4] now, and quite similar to the data in > [1]. Note that I do consider [1] much more interesting. > > (That said, if anyone would like me to make e.g. an XSLT for turning > [4] into something like [1], just say the word.) > > Best regards and happy easter! > Niklas > > [1]: <http://purl.org/NET/atom-link-rel> > [2]: <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml> > [3]: <http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/> > [4]: <http://bitbucket.org/niklasl/tripleheap/src/tip/iana-link-relations.rdf> > Niklas, Nice! I would once again suggest adding local "owl:equivalentProperty" assertions which enables a reasoner to treat the IANA URIs as synonyms. This is in line with what I like to call the: owl:shameAs pattern :-) Kingsley > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Michael Hausenblas > <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote: > >> Nathan, Phil, All, >> >> >>> and quote: >>> "If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be >>> considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/" >>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt >>> >>> obviously all the links defined by: >>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml >>> (from the atom rfc) >>> >>> >>>>> such as edit, self, related etc - with additional consideration to the >>>>> thought that these will end up in rdf via RDFa/grddl etc v soon if not >>>>> already. >>>>> >>>>> Any guidance? >>>>> >> Yes. Use [1] ... >> >> My motto is: acting rather than talking. So, I took [2] as a starting point >> - which is already in nice XHTML format - and manually added some RDFa. >> After an hour I ended up with [1] (though, to be fair, two Wii games with >> the kids and consuming some Easter eggs also took place in that hour). >> >> So, [1] is really a sort of an interim solution (though, in the distributed >> data world I do expect much more of such fixes) and I encourage Phil, who is >> an editor of [2] to use the template from [1] at the 'official' location. >> >> Happy Easter! (and back to Wii games, for now ;) >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] http://purl.org/NET/atom-link-rel >> [2] http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml >> >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> >> >> >>> From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> >>> Organization: webr3 >>> Reply-To: <nathan@webr3.org> >>> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:14:16 +0100 >>> To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org> >>> Subject: Re: Using predicates which have no ontology? >>> Resent-From: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org> >>> Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:14:54 +0000 >>> >>> Danny Ayers wrote: >>> >>>> On 3 April 2010 00:53, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Any guidance on using predicates in linked data / rdf which do not come >>>>> from rdfs/owl. Specifically I'm considering the range of: >>>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/* >>>>> >>>> Can't find a URL that resolves there >>>> >>> snap; but that's what rel="edit" and so forth resolves to. >>> >>> see example: >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/selfDescribingDocuments.html#ATOMSection >>> >>> and quote: >>> "If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be >>> considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/" >>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt >>> >>> obviously all the links defined by: >>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml >>> (from the atom rfc) >>> >>> >>>>> such as edit, self, related etc - with additional consideration to the >>>>> thought that these will end up in rdf via RDFa/grddl etc v soon if not >>>>> already. >>>>> >>>>> Any guidance? >>>>> >>>> By using something as a predicate you are making statements about it. But... >>>> >>>> If you can find IANA terms like this, please use them - though beware >>>> the page isn't the concept. You might have to map them over to your >>>> own namespace, PURL URIs preferred. >>>> >>> Would it make sense to knock up an ontology for all the standard >>> link-relations and sameAs them through to the iana uri's? >>> >>> Best, Nathan >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 12:50:41 UTC