- From: Sebastian Tramp <tramp@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 22:19:47 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
quote Nathan (4.4.2010): Hi Nathan, maybe this is interesting for you: http://aksw.org/Projects/SemanticPingback best regards S.Tramp > Over the past couple of months, the notion of bidirectional links and > "back-links" for linked data keeps playing on my mind. > > In many scenarios I can see scope for wanting to be informed of > back-links / track-backs, especially when it comes to sameAs, seeAlso > and different use-cases such as decentralized discussions of subjects > and suchlike. > > Regardless of the specific use-case, I think this is something many will > hit on as the web of linked data progresses (esp. read/write), and > wouldn't it be wonderful if methods had been pre-specified - or maybe > they already are and I just don't see it! > > Please do see: "Should the links be monodirectional or bidirectional?" > at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Topology.html > > Many Regards, > > Nathan > -- Sebastian Tramp - Department of Computer Science; University of Leipzig Tel/Fax: +49 341 97 323-66/-29 http://bis.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianTramp
Received on Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:20:17 UTC