- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:56:27 +0100
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Michael Hausenblas wrote: > Nathan, Phil, All, > >> and quote: >> "If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be >> considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/" >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt >> >> obviously all the links defined by: >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml >> (from the atom rfc) >> >>>> such as edit, self, related etc - with additional consideration to the >>>> thought that these will end up in rdf via RDFa/grddl etc v soon if not >>>> already. >>>> >>>> Any guidance? > > Yes. Use [1] ... > > My motto is: acting rather than talking. So, I took [2] as a starting point > - which is already in nice XHTML format - and manually added some RDFa. > After an hour I ended up with [1] (though, to be fair, two Wii games with > the kids and consuming some Easter eggs also took place in that hour). > > So, [1] is really a sort of an interim solution (though, in the distributed > data world I do expect much more of such fixes) and I encourage Phil, who is > an editor of [2] to use the template from [1] at the 'official' location. > > Happy Easter! (and back to Wii games, for now ;) > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://purl.org/NET/atom-link-rel > [2] http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml > Thanks Michael :) and strangely I'm playing the wii w/ kids and eating easter eggs too <hoorah!> Cheers & Happy Easter, Nathan
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 19:57:09 UTC