- From: Kurt J <kurtjx@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:21:05 +0100
- To: music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
Hello All, It seems there are (too) many options for creating music-related URIs. They are mostly all based on Musicbrainz.org IDs (which is quite appropriate), but it can be difficult to know which to choose. I can identify at least four different sources of artist URIs based on musicbrainz ids: 1. dbtune.org/musicbrainz pros: there are uris for records, tracks, and artists (and more), they dereference nicely; a nice comprehensive mapping cons: it's updated only periodically from the musicbrainz dumps 2. bbc.co.uk/music pros: well maintained by hard-working professionals; deref nicely w/ fancy content neg cons: afaik, no URIs for releases, tracks - just artists; it is arguably biased by bbc interests (not saying i believe this myself) 3. zitgist.com pros: samesAs links from DBpedia; includes URIs for records / tracks / etc cons: not sure how often they are updated from musicbrainz; not sure why, but seem to have fallen out of fashion somewhat (any reasons?) 4. musicbrainz.org pros: this is 'the source' of all these ids and suc cons: afaik, these do not actually deref to any RDF; also note, URIs like this http://musicbrainz.org/music/artist/20072862-5132-478e-b9e2-8a3aa308cd89 appear in http://lod.openlinksw.com/ i think this might be a mistake in xslt or something - not only do these not actually deref to rdf, they return 404 from Musicbrainz - perhaps there is some thing i am not understandin tho. i believe the '/music/' should be removed - then musibrainz.org handles the URI and returns an html page. As I mentioned before, we are giving a tutorial on music information retrieval and the semantic web, see: http://ismir2009.dbtune.org/ Put simply, what URIs do I tell people to use? Thanks. -Kurt J
Received on Sunday, 6 September 2009 12:21:48 UTC