- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:20:07 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 23:48 +0000, Nathan wrote:
> - which are the preferred ontologies to use when trying to be very
> specific about a subject (rather than dc.subject dc.creator etc which
> are essentially free text based not URI identifier based)
It's worth mentioning that RDFa makes it pretty trivial (compared to
other RDF serialisations) to mark up multiple triples which differ only
in their predicate.
e.g.
<p xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
By <a about=""
rel="foaf:maker dc:creator :author"
rev="foaf:made :made"
href="#i"
>me</a>.
</p>
which creates the following five triples:
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
@prefix xhv: <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#> .
<> foaf:maker <#i> .
<> dc:creator <#i> .
<> xhv:author <#i> .
<#i> foaf:made <> .
<#i> xhv:made <> .
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 10:20:59 UTC