- From: Olaf Hartig <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:03:50 +0200
- To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On Sunday 18 October 2009 18:50:50 Hugh Glaser wrote: > [...] > In the current practice, the site minted a URI for the book, and then > asserted owl:sameAs to other URIs - hopefully including mine, hidden in the > RDF about the site's URI. > > In the current SWCL, for example, (I think) if I ask about a dbpedia URI, > the only default place it looks is dbpedia. You can switch on the option to > consult Sindice, and so it may get to some places that Sindice has managed > to find, but that is it. And there are a lot of people making assertions > using dbpedia URIs. > > I'm not saying this is the best way to do it (I don't think it is) - I'm > only pointing out that this is what currently happens for the sort of > scheme you describe. It's great as far as it goes, but we should be careful > to note any limitations. Point taken. Olaf
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 21:04:14 UTC