Re: RDF Update Feeds + URI time travel on HTTP-level

Nathan wrote:
> timestamp the predicate in a triple.
> 
> please do tell me the flaw in my thinking.
> 

scrap that, sorry for the noise, doesn't cater for indicating data has
been removed

however point remains that perhaps synchronisation (date or version)
data should perhaps be in the RDF rather than outside the scope of rdf?

Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 11:32:54 UTC