- From: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:52:34 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>, public-lod@w3.org
In message <4AFEBC7C.3060709@webr3.org>, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> writes >> Yeah, certainly worth investigating - an owl:differentFrom is also a >> link after all. By definition it's likely to go to data that you don't >> actually want, but probably the best way of dealing with that is >> figure out what's needed to get it...then do the opposite. > >did a provisional check by querying the sparql endpoint at >lod.openlinksw.com : > >owl:differentFrom = 25 { http://bit.ly/1rnLEw } >owl:sameAs = 59,745,648 { http://bit.ly/14FdEE } But owl:disjointWith does rather better (scoring 19979). Anyway, a quick look at a typical Wikipedia disambiguation page (I went for Boston) suggests that it doesn't provide information in a particularly tractable form for this purpose. Richard -- Richard Light
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2009 22:54:35 UTC