> I donıt think I can give your browser any URI I choose that resolves using > http to a typical LD document? > > If not, it is not a linked data browser. > Under this strict definition (which I am now inclined to accept, in that I do believe misuse of these monikers can indeed derail the original LOD vision), no linked data browser exists nor has anyone met the formidable challenge of producing one (or please cite if you know of any). So I suppose we will need a new classification for my browser :) Would you like to offer suggestions? Thanks so much for your patience in clarifying this point. > > I used to have a mantra: ³Putting the Web into Semantic Web². > It now seems I need to say ³Putting the Web back into Linked Data², or even > ³Putting the Web into the Web of Data². > LOL! -sherman
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 23:52:22 UTC