- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:05:52 -0400
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@inf.puc-rio.br>, Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Michael Hausenblas wrote: > Daniel, Kingsley, Giovanni, > > My 0.02€: > > To have more than one option for discovery at hand is definitely no > drawback, I'm trying to outreach and gather reactions from a wider audience > at [1]. > > @Giovanni: re applications, precisely my point [2] - there needs to be an > incentive beyond being a good citizen on planet LOD, getting papers accepted > and acknowledgement by peers in the group. We need to demonstrate people the > power and they will start to pick up - but they actually start to do, when > looking at recent developments ;) > > Michael, > @Kingsley: Good practice notes? Sure, as you know we have them [3] and they > should be extended and updated (re this issue, RDFa and maybe more IMHO) > Should this not be done (at least drafted) in a Wiki, my question was a really aimed at determining preferred Wiki space :-) Kingsley > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://webofdata.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/sparql-endpoint-discovery/ > [2] http://sw-app.org/pub/exploit-lod-webapps-IEEEIC-preprint.pdf > [3] http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/ > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 11:06:39 UTC