- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:39:48 +0100
- To: Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@inf.puc-rio.br>
- CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-lod@w3.org, Andraz Tori <andraz@zemanta.com>
On 2/3/09 15:23, Daniel Schwabe wrote: > On 02/03/2009 10:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> ... >> De-referencable URIs, Negotable Representation of Resource >> Descriptions, and other elements of the Linked Data Web's FORCE as are >> simply there to be tapped by current/next generation of innovators on >> the Web and/or across the Enterprise en route to solving real >> problems. Examples ares would include: >> >> 1. Identity (decentralized and non-repudiatable variety via foaf+ssl >> which is ultimately going to be sparql+ssl) -- then we can fix mail, >> commenting and other critical aspects of the Web and Internet > Hmmm, are you proposing this as an alternative to, say, OpenID? Can you > elaborate on this a bit more? I for one would be upset to see foaf+ssl promoted as a rival to OpenID. The two approaches should play well in the same environment, I hope. For example, logging into my OpenID provider with SSL certs... Dan
Received on Monday, 2 March 2009 14:40:26 UTC