- From: Martin Hepp (UniBW) <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:37:37 +0200
- To: richard.hancock@3kbo.com
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4A43C3F1.4010101@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Hi Richard, apologies for getting back to this with quite some delay. richard.hancock@3kbo.com wrote: > Hi Martin, > > the GoodRelations Annotator worked well. To try it out I used it to create > and publish a semanticweb.rdf file for my embryonic business at > http://www.3kbo.com/semanticweb.rdf. > Great! > I'm interested in extending the links from the semanticweb.rdf to other > things. In particular linking the BusinessEntity with people and with > other BusinessEntitys. > > Initially I added the URI of my foaf file to the BusinessEntity instance > using rdfs:seeAlso, but after reading the definition of BusinessEntity > i.e. that it "represents the legal agent making a particular offering and > can be a legal body or a person" I changed it to owl:sameAs. > > E.g. > > <gr:BusinessEntity rdf:ID="BusinessEntity"> > ... > <owl:sameAs > rdf:resource="http://www.3kbo.com/people/richard.hancock/foaf.rdf#i"/> > ... > </gr:BusinessEntity> > That sounds correct. > This makes sense for my simple case, since as a sole trader I am the > BusinessEntity and owl:sameAs also provides an inferred link from my foaf > file to the semanticweb.rdf. > > But I am also interested in describing other more complex relationships > between a BusinessEntity (when not a person) and the people involved with > the business (e.g. directors, CEO etc ...) and between other > BusinessEntitys. > For clarification: BusinessEntity is basically the class of legal agents that can offer or demand goods on markets, e.g. individuals, corporations, etc. > Do you now of an ontology along the lines of foaf > (http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/) and relationship > (http://vocab.org/relationship/) that could be used? > I think others have already replied, again just for clarification: It is outside the scope of GoodRelations to model such relationships between agents. So yes, I recommend looking into foaf and others for expressing membership of individuals in a legal organization, particular roles, ownership, etc. The basic conceptual structure of an offer on the Web is a) an Agent (someone) b) an Object or Happening (something) c) a relationship between those two that represents the promise to transfer a set of (property) rights on the Object to another agent if that agent contributes a certain compensation to the agent. See also the attached figure from a recent talk. Again, thanks for your interest, time, and the experience report. If you have any other suggestions, please let me know. Best wishes Martin > Cheers, > > Richard Hancock > > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp@computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp twitter: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast: http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: "Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology" http://tinyurl.com/semtech-hepp Tool for registering your business: http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: http://tinyurl.com/goodrelations-universe Project page and resources for developers: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Tutorial materials: Tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_Tutorial_ESWC2009
Attachments
- image/png attachment: Picture_27.png
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 19:20:50 UTC