- From: Tom Heath <tom.heath@talis.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:33:46 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: giovanni.tummarello@deri.org, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org, public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
Hi all, 2009/6/25 Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>: > Giovanni Tummarello wrote: >>> >>> That can then be inserted as code snippets via copy-and-paste to any >>> XHTML >>> document. >>> >>> Any opinions? >>> >> >> Great, why bother with any other solution. >> even talking about any other solution is extraordinarely bad for the >> public perception of the semantic web community. >> >> Giovanni >> >> > Giovanni, > > We don't need mutual exclusivity re. Linked Data Deployment. > > There's nothing wrong with an array of options that cover a broad range of > Linked Data deployment circumstances. > > HTTP is the essence of the Web (what makes it what it is), and Content > Negotiation is intrinsic to HTTP. > > Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, really. +1, with bells on! I'm in complete agreement with Kingsley here which, as Twitter users will know, isn't something we can always take for granted ;) "Many different tools for many different jobs....many different tools for many different jobs...." Tom.
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 18:34:26 UTC