- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <swlists-040405@champin.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:13:20 +0100
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Le 24/06/2009 08:21, Danny Ayers a écrit : > As far as I'm aware we don't yet have an easy templating engine for > RDFa, so I suspect having that as the source is probably a good choice > for typical Web applications. you may be interested in Tal4Rdf, a template system for RDF that can produce HTML/XHTML (any XML in fact). It is not dedicated to RDFa, and I still do not have any RDFa example, but there should be no major problem to produce XHTML+RDFa with it. regards pa [1] http://champin.net/t4r > > As mentioned already GRDDL is available for transforming on the fly, > though I'm not sure of the level of client engine support at present. > Ditto providing a SPARQL endpoint is another way of maximising the > surface area of the data. > > But the key step has clearly been taken, that decision to publish data > directly without needing the human element to interpret it. > > I claim *win* for the Semantic Web, even if it'll still be a few years > before we see applications exploiting it in a way that provides real > benefit for the end user. > > my 2 cents. > > Cheers, > Danny. >
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 11:14:02 UTC