- From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:32:24 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Thanks everyone who replied. It seems that there's a lot of support for the RDFa route in that (perhaps not statistically significant) sample of opinion. But to summarise my understanding of your various bits of advice: since there aren't currently so many applications out there consuming RDF, a good RDF publisher should provide as many options as possible. Therefore rather than deciding for either RDFa or a content-negotiated approach, why not do both (and provide a dump file too) Cheers Bill
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 20:32:59 UTC