- From: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:58:31 +0200
- To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>, <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Dan, we will dual-license the next DBpedia release under CC-BY-SA and GFDL. We would even be willing go for a more liberal license (for instance CC-BY), I anybody with a legal background would assure us that we are allowed to do so under US and European law. Cheers, Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-lod-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lod-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Dan Brickley Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 09:38 An: public-lod@w3.org Betreff: Wikipedia relicensed: consequences for DBpedia and downstream? http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update/Implementation [[ As per the licensing update vote result and subsequent Wikimedia Foundation Board resolution, any content on Wikimedia Foundation projects currently available under GFDL 1.2 with the possibility of upgrading to a later version will be made available additionally under Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike 3.0 Unported. Specifically with regard to text, after this update, only dual-licensed content or CC-BY-SA-compatible content can be added to the projects, and GFDL-only submissions will no longer be accepted. In other words, CC-BY-SA will be the primary Wikimedia license for text, and GFDL will be retained as a secondary license. ]] According to http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Datasets#h18-18 DBpedia is available under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_Li cense Will it also be made available under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ ? ("Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported") What do these distinctions mean in practice when we're dealing with mergable data rather than documents? "Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license." ... seems rather strong (eg. for intranet triplestore use). Is anyone here not not a lawyer? cheers, Dan
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 07:59:09 UTC