- From: Tom Heath <tom.heath@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:14:49 +0300
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Dan, 2009/6/1 Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>: > On 1/6/09 10:48, Tom Heath wrote: >> >> Hi Dan, >> >> 2009/5/31 Dan Brickley<danbri@danbri.org>: >>> >>> On 31/5/09 10:40, Tom Heath wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Michael, >>>> >>>> The proposed time (7pm on the 1st) clashes with the LarKC Reception; >>>> from a political point of view there would probably be some value in >>>> Linked Data folks attending that event :) >>> >>> Why frame it in political terms? From an interesting-people-to-talk-to >>> point >>> of view, it'd be worth attending. From a using conferences to allow >>> sub-groups of our wider community to get to know each other, it'd >>> probably >>> be worth attending. From a figuring out how on earth we can compute with >>> all >>> this RDF data once it's out there perspective, also. And who knows, there >>> might even be a free glass of wine in it too, I've no idea. Sorry I can't >>> make it to either meetup this year... >> >> Why not? I choose that aspect as one that felt important, but chose >> not to enumerate all the other possible reasons for going. > > Can you spell out what you mean by "politics" in this situation? Maybe we're > talking past each other... To phrase it a different way, my hunch was that scheduling a Linked Data event to clash with the LarKC reception may have given the impression that the Linked Data community doesn't care about reasoning over very large amounts of data. Tom. -- Dr Tom Heath Researcher Platform Division Talis Information Ltd T: 0870 400 5000 W: http://www.talis.com/
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 15:15:30 UTC