- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:41:49 -0400
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-sparql-dev@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org
Last summer I asked around to gather favorite SPARQL queries to help me put together a SPARQL By Example tutorial/presentation. The only criterion was that the queries need to be runnable on the Web today. (i.e., no theoretic queries and no queries that rely on private data sets) A bunch of people responded with some great queries, and the result was the set of slides at [1]. I'll be giving a version of this talk as a tutorial at SemTech in a couple of weeks, and in preparation for that I'm going through and updating some of the queries[2], adding some more ones, etc. To that end, I wanted to turn to the community once again to ask if people have any new, interesting SPARQL queries or SPARQL'able data sets that they might care to share. I welcome simple queries or complex queries, as well as interesting data sets with SPARQL endpoints, even without specific queries. Of course, I'll be contributing the results back to the community for others to (hopefully) benefit from. In addition to queries that use only standard SPARQL, I'm also interested in queries that use implementation-specific extensions, particularly if they involve capabilities that the SPARQL 2 Working Group is working to standardize[3]. thanks very much! Lee [1] http://www.cambridgesemantics.com/2008/09/sparql-by-example/ [2] Somehow a query about Senators McCain and Obama's voting records seems a bit less relevant now. [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/FeatureProposal
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 06:42:30 UTC