- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:45:37 +0100
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Bernhard Schandl <bernhard.schandl@univie.ac.at>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Amrapali Zaveri <amrapali.zaveri@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, Anja Jentzsch <anja@anjeve.de>, Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@gmail.com>, David Baxter <retxabd@gmail.com>
On 24/07/2009 16:28, "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote: > As a constructive suggestion, an incremental improvement to sameAs.org > would be to systematically eradicate any references to dbpedia entries > that are disambiguation pages on wikipedia. > > -Alan > Thanks Alan. I'm not quite clear what you mean. If I look at something like http://dbpedia.org/resource/London_(disambiguation) I don't get anything (or rather I get a singleton bundle, which is the same). In general for this sort of data, we simply reflect the decisions made by the sources, such as dbpedia. Should we be rejecting some of their sameAs, or is it something you think should be changed by them? We do have a facility for "deprecating" URIs, which would mean they can be looked up, but are never published in a bundle; that might be the sort of thing you want? Best Hugh
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 15:46:52 UTC