Re: "How to Publish Linked Data" vs "Cool URIs don't change"

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Richard Cyganiak<richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
> On 10 Jul 2009, at 07:42, Christopher St John wrote:
>>
>> Specifically, in Section 3 "Choosing URIs" of HtPLDotW,
>> the suggestion to use mnemonic names (names linked to
>> some of the data about the object) has proven to be
>> problematic in practice.
>

> Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> replied:
>
> When it comes to opaque or mnemonic URIs, there is a tradeoff between
> reusability and longevity. Entirely opaque URIs are less likely to be
> re-used and linked to than mnemonic ones.
>

That doesn't seem to be the case in practice. Geonames is a
good counterexample.

Permalinks have proven to be the best candidates for re-use in
the web at large (for the reasons listed in the Cool URIs doc). I
suspect they're the best candidates for re-use on the web of
linked data, too.

-cks

--
Christopher St. John
cks@praxisbridge.com
http://praxisbridge.com
http://artofsystems.blogspot.com

Received on Saturday, 11 July 2009 14:41:52 UTC