In message <EMEW3|b88ea541556c1ff93cb7842c018e2d08l681Q702hg|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C21D%hg @ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> writes >> Hash URIs are very valuable in linked data, precisely *because* they >> can't be directly requested from a server - they allow us to bypass >> the whole HTTP 303 issue. >Mind you, it does mean that you should make sure that you don't put too many >LD URIs in one document. >If dbpedia decided to represent all the RDF in one document, and then use >hash URIs, it would be somewhat problematic. One aspect of this that puzzles me is how you do the "deliver a human-readable or machine-processible version depending on the Accept header" trick when the actual resource is a single RDF document containing hash-referenced assertions. Richard -- Richard LightReceived on Thursday, 9 July 2009 07:45:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:44 UTC