- From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:08:49 +0100
- To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Cc: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Seth Russell <russell.seth@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On 9 Jul 2009, at 07:44, Juan Sequeda wrote: > On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> Mind you, it does mean that you should make sure that you don't >> put too many >> LD URIs in one document. >> If dbpedia decided to represent all the RDF in one document, and >> then use >> hash URIs, it would be somewhat problematic. > > Could you explain why??? The very practical problem of file sizes. Your hash URIs can of course be distributed across a collection of files. e.g. http://example.com/~alice/foaf.rdf#me http://example.com/~bob/foaf.rdf#me http://example.com/~carol/foaf.rdf#me -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 07:08:52 UTC