- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:14:07 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On Monday 14. December 2009 11:17:37 Dan Brickley wrote: > I wish that kind of funding was easy to come > by, but it's not. A lot of the work we need to get done around here to > speed up progress is pretty boring stuff. It's not cutting edge > research, nor the core of a world-changing startup, nor a good topic > for a phd. I can attest to that. I've been searching for this kind of funding for half a year now, and I've failed. The RDF toolchain is in a terrible state, but I do not think the focus should be on parser, and that basic stuff. Even though native toolchains are missing for some languages, the things that are there, notably Redland with all its language bindings, are still good enough. What's missing are the tools that are needed on the top of that to make the developers efficient, not just in publishing data, but more importantly using the data to provide groundbreaking services that are truly useful to a large number of people. I've been around for 11 years, albeit more to and from than danbri, but I have yet to see one semweb application that does this. Some come close, like DBPedia Mobile, it had a lot of potential, but it needed polish that it hasn't got so far. One problem, is that there are some open questions, like how to use an ever-changing model in an existing Model View Controller framework. This was something I tried to address, as it should be the strength of RDF and something to distinguish us from the SQL world, but the business perspective says that this is research and the researchers say it is mere stamp collecting. I've been involved in research projects that have had it as their main goal to provide semweb frameworks for general consumption, that has spent huge amounts of money on research, but has totally failed to achieve their goal because they didn't acknowledge that this problem, however trivial it may seem, has not been solved, or at least, the solution isn't on PEAR, CPAN or in Debian. That brings me to another, but smaller problem, where the tools exist, with the exception of Redland, they are not available, and/or have not gone through the QA process of for example Debian. It is extremely important for a developer to have quick access to the toolchain. It is therefore critical, I believe, that e.g. Virtuoso and 4store goes into Debian. Due to my failure to find funding, I'm changing strategy, I'm leaving the semweb world, hopefully temporarily, to learn the tools that good developers are using. I believe that we're not going forward unless we can provide developer tools, and they are not there. Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo kjetil@kjernsmo.net http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 19:14:46 UTC